Collagenous pouchitis

Collagenous colitis is characterised by watery diarrhoea, normal colonic mucosa on endoscopy, diffuse colitis with surface epithelial injury, and a distinctive thickening of the subepithelial collagen table on histology. Some patients can develop medically refractory collagenous colitis, in which case they may require surgical intervention. This is the first report of collagenous pouchitis in a collagenous colitis patient with proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. A patient with medically refractory collagenous colitis who underwent a total proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis was sequentially evaluated with an endoscopy and histology of the colon, distal small intestine, and ileal pouch. A 58-year-old female had a 10-year history of collagenous colitis before having a total proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for medically refractory disease. The histologic features of collagenous colitis were present in all colon and rectum biopsy or resection specimens, but were absent in the distal ileum specimen. The post-operative course was complicated by persistent increase of stool frequency, abdominal cramps, and incontinence. A pouch endoscopy was performed 3 years after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis which showed the histologic features of collagenous colitis in the ileal pouch, collagenous pouchitis, while the pre-pouch neo-terminal ileum had no pathologic changes. After antibiotic therapy, the histologic changes of collagenous pouchitis resolved. This is the first reported case of collagenous pouchitis. Since the abnormal collagen table and its associated features were only present in the pouch and absent in the neo-terminal ileum, and the patient had histologic improvement after antibiotic therapy, it would suggest that faecal stasis and bacterial load may play a role in the pathogenesis.     

Appropriate ICD therapy in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy: long term follow-up

The implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) has proved effective in preventing sudden death and decreasing mortality in randomised secondary prevention trials. Some nonrandomized studies have reported different incidences and predictors of appropriate ICD therapy in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). The antiarrhythmic and other medical therapies were different between the published studies and it was reported that not using beta-blockers was a predictor of appropriate ICD therapy. In the present study, we report on our long-term experience with ICD therapy in patients with DCM, the majority of whom were treated with beta-blockers and amiodarone. The study population consisted of 25 patients with DCM who underwent initial transvenous ICD implantation between December 1995 and May 2005. Indications for ICD implantation were monomorphic sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) in 16 patients (64%), cardiac arrest in 8 patients (32%), and syncope plus inducible VT in one patient. Twenty-four patients underwent an electrophysiologic study (EPS). In 18 patients, the ICDs were programmed to only shocks and in 7 patients an additional antitachycardia pacing program was performed. One patient was lost to follow-up and 24 patients were followed-up primarily in our ICD pacemaker outpatient clinic. Appropriate ICD therapy was defined as antitachycardia pacing therapy or shock for tachyarrhythmia determined by evaluation of the clinical information and by device diagnostics to be either ventricular fibrillation or ventricular tachycardia. The mean follow-up was 39.29 +/- 30.59 months after ICD implantation. At follow-up, 17 patients were using a beta-blocker and 16 patients amiodarone. Appropriate ICD therapy was observed in 14 patients (58%). The detected arrhythmias were VT in 12 patients, ventricular fibrillation (VF) in one, and VT and VF in one patient. The time to first ICD therapy was 15.93 +/- 18.45 (range, 1-74) months. Using the Kaplan-Meier method, the percent survival free of appropriate ICD therapy was 82%, 72%, 66%, and 55% at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years follow-up, respectively. The clinical, echocardiographic, and electrophysiologic characteristics did not differ between those who did and did not receive appropriate ICD therapy. However, the mean QRS duration was significantly longer in patients who received appropriate ICD therapies. Cox regression analysis did not reveal any factors that predicted appropriate ICD therapy. Five patients (21%) died during follow-up. Four deaths were classified as cardiac and one as noncardiac. The cumulative survival from total death was 94%, 82%, 82%, and 69%, and the cumulative survival from cardiac death was 94%, 82%, 82%, and 76% during 1, 2, 3, and 4 years of follow-up, respectively. In summary, in this selected patient population with DCM, the majority of patients were unresponsive to beta-blocker and antiarrhythmic therapy. Most of these patients received appropriate ICD therapy during follow-up. Cox regression analysis did not identify any factors that predicted appropriate ICD therapy. Additional trials with larger patient populations are needed to detect the predictors of appropriate ICD therapy in patients with DCM.     

Current treatment of hepatitis C virus infection

New strategies have led to better results in the treatment of HCV infection during the last few years. At present the recommended treatment for patients with chronic hepatitis C is a combination of pegylated interferon and ribavirin. The sustained virological response rate of this combination therapy is 42 - 48 % for patients with genotype 1 after a course of 48 weeks and 80 % for patients with genotype 2 or 3 after a course of 24 weeks. New nucleoside analogs may lead to a better tolerance and better outcomes. A new approach is the long term monotherapy with pegylated interferon in order to reduce the progression of fibrosis and the incidence of cirrhotic complications. At present the effectivity of protease inhibitors and of a therapeutic immunisation with the E1 envelope protein of the hepatitis C virus are being examined. Because the optimal treatment strategy for patients with an acute hepatitis C infection is still unclear, these patients should be included in clinical studies.     

Primary Resection With Anastomosis vs. Hartmann’s Procedure in Nonelective Surgery for Acute Colonic Diverticulitis: A Systematic Review

Purpose This study compares primary resection with anastomosis and Hartmann's procedure in an adult population with acute colonic diverticulitis. Methods Comparative studies published between 1984 and 2004 of primary resection with anastomosis vs. Hartmann's procedure were included. The primary end point was postoperative mortality. Secondary end points included surgical and medical morbidity, operative time, and length of postoperative hospitalization. Random effects model was used and sensitivity analysis was performed. Results Fifteen studies, including 963 patients (57 percent primary resection with anastomoses, 43 percent Hartmann's procedures), were analyzed. Overall mortality was significantly reduced with primary resection and anastomosis (4.9 vs. 15.1 percent; odds ratio = 0.41). Subgroup analysis of trials matched for emergency operations showed significantly decreased mortality with primary resection and anastomosis (7.4 vs. 15.6 percent; odds ratio = 0.44). No significant difference in mortality was observed in trials matched for severity of peritonitis Hinchey > 2 (14.1 vs. 14.4 percent; odds ratio = 0.85). Sensitivity analysis did not reveal significant heterogeneity between the studies for the primary outcome. Conclusions Patients selected for primary resection and anastomosis have a lower mortality than those treated by Hartmann's procedure in the emergency setting and comparable mortality under conditions of generalized peritonitis (Hinchey > 2). The retrospective nature of the included studies allows for a considerable degree of selection bias that limits robust and clinically sound conclusions. This analysis highlights the need for high-quality randomized trials comparing the two techniques.     

Hospital acquired infections (HAI) in the elderly: comparison with the younger patients

The aim of this retrospective study is to determine the frequency, type, microbiological characteristics and outcome of HAIs in the elderly (age ≥ 65) and to compare the data with younger patients in a Turkish Training and Research Hospital. From January 2008 to December 2009, the infection control team analyzed HAIs among 60,585 hospitalized patients (20,109 aged ≥ 65 and 40,747 aged between 18 and 64 years) with a total number of 419,017 patient days. A total of 825 HAIs episodes were detected in 607 patients, of which 395 episodes were in 301 elderly patients. The incidence of HAIs per 1000 patient days was 2.49 in the elderly and 1.64 in the younger patients’ group (p < 0.001). The most common site of infection in the elderly patients was the urinary tract, whereas in non-elderly group this was the lower respiratory tract. The incidence density of urinary tract infections, respiratory tract infections, surgical site, skin and soft tissue infections, primary bacteremia, and prosthesis infections were significantly higher in the elderly group (p < 0.05). Gram-negative species were the most frequently isolated agents in both groups. There were no significant differences between the groups in the frequency of isolated pathogens or antibiotic susceptibility patterns. Overall, the fatality rate was found 16.8%. The elderly patients were more likely to have crude mortality rates (22% vs. 12%; p < 0.01). The death was most often related to pneumonia, primary bacteremia or intravascular catheter infections in both groups.     

Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome and erectile dysfunction: does long term continuous positive airway pressure therapy improve erections?

ObjectivesThe aim of this age-matched, controlled, prospective clinical study was to investigate frequency and degree of erectile dysfunction (ED) in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) and to evaluate the results of only continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy on ED in patients with OSAS.ResultsWhen compared to the control group, a decrease in IIEF-5 scores was found in patients with OSAS. However, this decrease was not statistically significant. After 3 months of CPAP usage in patients with mild to moderate and severe degree OSAS, improvement in IIEF-5 scores was statistically significant. Mean value of IIEF-5 score was 16.63±5.91 before CPAP and were improved up to 20.92±6.79 (P=0.001).ConclusionIt is not certainly possible to say that OSAS is clearly associated with ED. However, after 3 months of regular CPAP usage, ED complaints in patients with OSAS might improve positively. Trials with larger series may give more conclusive data.     

Chronic noncancer pain management in primary care: family medicine physicians’ risk assessment of opioid misuse

Objective: The majority of patients with chronic noncancer pain (CNCP) are managed in the primary care settings. The primary care family physician (PCFP) generally has limited time, training, or access to resources to effectively evaluate and treat these patients, particularly when there is the added potential liability of prescribing opioids. The aim of this study is to make a favorable change in PCFPs’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices about opioid use in CNCP via education on assessment of the risk of opioid misuse. Materials and methods: The universe of this cross-sectional study comprised 36 family physicians working at Family Health Centers affiliated to Antalya Provincial Directorate of Health who volunteered to participate in the study. Initially, a survey on patients risk assessment was performed in both intervention and control groups; whereas the intervention group received education on assessment of the risk of opioid misuse, the control group did not. The survey was repeated after 6 months and the intervention group underwent a core examination. Data obtained were analyzed with Statistical Package for the Social Sciences 18.0 statistics program. Intervention and control groups were compared. Additionally, pre- and post-education results of the intervention group were also compared. Results: About 61.1% of family physicians reported concern and hesitation in prescribing opioids due to known risks, such as overdose, addiction, dependence, or diversion, and agreed that family physicians should apply risk assessment before opioid use in CNCP. Only 16.6% of PCFP reported that risk assessment is not so necessary, whereas 22.2% of PCFP were undecided. Although 47.2% of the family physicians expressed a willingness to apply risk assessment before starting opioids, the rate of eagerness increased markedly to 77.7% after the education, but the rate of increase in practicing was not statistically significant. Conclusion: Knowledge and competency of the family physicians in managing CNCP were improved as was expected. Although the rate of eagerness about risk assessment of opioid misuse was increased, expected increase in the rate of using risk assessment was not achieved. Further studies are needed to identify the reasons of the difficulties on changing the attitudes and practices of primary care physicians about this subject.